1969 AMC Hornet vs. 2007 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac STS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 AMC Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 AMC Hornet would be higher. At 4,983 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 AMC Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac STS (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1969 AMC Hornet. (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1969 AMC Hornet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 AMC Hornet (414 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Cadillac STS. (342 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 AMC Hornet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
1969 AMC Hornet | 2007 Cadillac STS | |
Make | AMC | Cadillac |
Model | Hornet | STS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4983 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 414 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95.3 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87.4 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2960 mm |