1969 Audi Variant vs. 1973 Zastava 1300

To start off, 1973 Zastava 1300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Audi Variant would be higher. At 1,696 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Audi Variant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Audi Variant weights approximately 86 kg more than 1973 Zastava 1300.

Because 1973 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Audi Variant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Audi Variant (113 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 Audi Variant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: