1969 Audi Variant vs. 2001 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Audi Variant would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (222 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1969 Audi Variant. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1969 Audi Variant.
Because 2001 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Audi Variant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Land Rover Range Rover (407 Nm) has 294 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Audi Variant. (113 Nm). This means 2001 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Audi Variant | 2001 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Audi | Land Rover |
Model | Variant | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1696 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 222 HP |
Torque | 113 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2550 mm |