1969 Audi Variant vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Audi Variant would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1969 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1969 Audi Variant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 850 kg more than 1969 Audi Variant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Audi Variant. (113 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Audi Variant | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | Variant | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 87 L |
