1969 Audi Variant vs. 2006 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1969 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1969 Audi Variant.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Audi Variant. (113 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Audi Variant | 2006 Chevrolet HHR | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Variant | HHR |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 61 L |
