1969 Audi Variant vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Audi Variant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Audi Variant would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1969 Audi Variant. (53 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1969 Audi Variant.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Audi Variant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Audi Variant. (113 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Audi Variant.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Audi Variant | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Audi | Citroen |
| Model | Variant | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1696 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
