1969 Austin 1300 vs. 1950 Bristol 450
To start off, 1969 Austin 1300 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin 1300 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin 1300 | 1950 Bristol 450 | |
| Make | Austin | Bristol |
| Model | 1300 | 450 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 66 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 54 L |
