1969 Austin 1300 vs. 1973 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1973 Cadillac Calais is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Cadillac Calais (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 1390 kg more than 1969 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin 1300 | 1973 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | 1300 | Calais |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 2245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3310 mm |
