1969 Austin 1300 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 465 kg more than 1969 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | 1300 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |