1969 Austin 1300 vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1983 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,439 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 69 kg more than 1969 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mitsubishi Colt (102 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1983 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 1983 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1300 | Colt |
Year Released | 1969 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 924 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2390 mm |