1969 Austin 1300 vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1986 Ford Aerostar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Aerostar (99 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 555 kg more than 1969 Austin 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 99 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 68.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3030 mm |