1969 Austin 1300 vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1986 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin 1300 (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin 1300 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 81 kg more than 1969 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mitsubishi Colt (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1986 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 1986 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1300 | Colt |
Year Released | 1969 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2390 mm |