1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Austin 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 475 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 576 Nm |
Top Speed | 148 km/hour | 249 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2850 mm |