1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2002 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2002 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 2002 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Neon |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2650 mm |