1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2006 BMW 525
To start off, 2006 BMW 525 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 BMW 525 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 525 (215 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300.
Because 2006 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 525 (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 2006 BMW 525 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | 1300 | 525 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2999 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 87.9 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 70 L |