1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Austin 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | 1300 | Ram |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 216 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 68 L |