1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota RunX (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota RunX (171 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | RunX |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 91.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 60 L |