1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2008 BMW Z4
To start off, 2008 BMW Z4 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW Z4 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1969 Austin 1300.
Because 2008 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW Z4 (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2008 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 2008 BMW Z4 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | 1300 | Z4 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Top Speed | 148 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 55 L |