1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300. 2009 Nissan Cube has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin 1300 has manual transmission. 1969 Austin 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Cube will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin 1300 | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | 1300 | Cube |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 82 L |
