1969 Austin 1300 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 1300 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1969 Austin 1300. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 1300.
Because 2011 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin 1300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 1300. (101 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 1300 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | 1300 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 101 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 74 L |