1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1979 Toyota Celica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1979 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 1979 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 310 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1969 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | 3-Litre | Celica |
Year Released | 1969 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2640 mm |