1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 1989 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1989 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 460 kg more than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 1989 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | 3-Litre | Brougham |
Year Released | 1969 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3090 mm |