1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 415 kg more than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Because 1969 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW (240 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (218 Nm). This means 2001 Mitsubishi SUW will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 3-Litre | SUW |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1097 cc |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 71 L |
