1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2003 Citroen C2
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 500 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1969 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2003 Citroen C2 | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | 3-Litre | C2 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 72 HP |
| Torque | 218 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 41 L |
