1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 423 more horse power than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 532 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (218 Nm). This means 2003 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Austin | Pagani |
Model | 3-Litre | Zonda |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 547 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 750 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2730 mm |