1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin 3-Litre weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
Make | Austin | Spyker |
Model | 3-Litre | C8 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3999 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 100 L |