1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2005 Kia Optima
To start off, 2005 Kia Optima is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Optima (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Optima weights approximately 7 kg more than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Optima, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (218 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Optima. (199 Nm). This means 1969 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Optima.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2005 Kia Optima | |
Make | Austin | Kia |
Model | 3-Litre | Optima |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 199 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 87.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1497 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |