1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 854 kg more than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (218 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | 3-Litre | Armada |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83.4 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 106 L |