1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2008 Volkswagen Eos

To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.

Because 1969 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Austin 3-Litre 2008 Volkswagen Eos
Make Austin Volkswagen
Model 3-Litre Eos
Year Released 1969 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 124 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 281 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 55 L