1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 220 more horse power than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin 3-Litre. (218 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin 3-Litre.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | 3-Litre | Calais |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |