1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2011 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2011 Holden Colorado is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2011 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (218 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 1969 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2011 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | 3-Litre | Colorado |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 207 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |