1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2011 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2011 Opel Meriva is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Austin 3-Litre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2011 Opel Meriva. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Austin 3-Litre should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Because 1969 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Austin 3-Litre (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Meriva. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1969 Austin 3-Litre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2011 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Austin | Opel |
Model | 3-Litre | Meriva |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |