1969 Austin 3-Litre vs. 2012 Renault Latitude
To start off, 2012 Renault Latitude is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin 3-Litre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin 3-Litre would be higher.
Because 1969 Austin 3-Litre is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin 3-Litre. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Latitude, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin 3-Litre | 2012 Renault Latitude | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | 3-Litre | Latitude |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4897 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1832 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2760 mm |