1969 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1982 Opel Ascona is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Opel |
| Model | Sprite | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1796 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 115 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
