1969 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1988 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 1988 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Pontiac Grand Am, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1988 Pontiac Grand Am | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Pontiac |
| Model | Sprite | Grand Am |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1996 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1710 mm |
