1969 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 1992 Nissan Micra
To start off, 1992 Nissan Micra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,270 cc, 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin-Healey Sprite | 1992 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Nissan |
Model | Sprite | Micra |
Year Released | 1969 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 988 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1570 mm |