1969 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2000 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2000 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | Austin-Healey | Chrysler |
Model | Sprite | Voyager |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1996 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 131 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1930 mm |