1969 Austin-Healey Sprite vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin-Healey Sprite | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Toyota |
| Model | Sprite | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1795 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1720 mm |
