1969 Austin Maxi vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1969 Austin Maxi is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin Maxi weights approximately 327 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Austin | DAF |
Model | Maxi | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 33 L |