1969 Austin Maxi vs. 1981 Alpina B 10
To start off, 1981 Alpina B 10 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Alpina B 10 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Alpina B 10 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 1981 Alpina B 10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Alpina B 10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Alpina B 10 (469 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Austin Maxi. (144 Nm). This means 1981 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 1981 Alpina B 10 | |
Make | Austin | Alpina |
Model | Maxi | B 10 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1748 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 469 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2840 mm |