1969 Austin Maxi vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 1982 Renault 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Austin Maxi is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Austin Maxi weights approximately 17 kg more than 1982 Renault 5.
Because 1982 Renault 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Renault 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Maxi | 1982 Renault 5 | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | Maxi | 5 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 51 L |
