1969 Austin Maxi vs. 1983 Dodge Mirada
To start off, 1983 Dodge Mirada is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 5,210 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Mirada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Dodge Mirada weights approximately 713 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 1983 Dodge Mirada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Dodge Mirada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Maxi | 1983 Dodge Mirada | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | Maxi | Mirada |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2870 mm |
