1969 Austin Maxi vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 573 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 1997 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 1997 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Maxi | E |
Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 70 L |