1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2000 Cadillac Seville
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Seville is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 758 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Cadillac Seville has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Cadillac Seville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2000 Cadillac Seville | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Maxi | Seville |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 4565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 68 L |