1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2000 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2000 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,464 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 408 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 2000 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Austin Maxi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Maxi | 2000 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | Maxi | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2464 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 57 L |
