1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2002 BMW M3
To start off, 2002 BMW M3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 3,997 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW M3 weights approximately 113 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 2002 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2002 BMW M3 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | Maxi | M3 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 444 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1100 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2890 mm |