1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2002 Dodge Razor
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 148 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 2002 Dodge Razor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Dodge Razor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Austin Maxi | 2002 Dodge Razor | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | Maxi | Razor |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 76 L |
