1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 2,507 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 411 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1969 Austin Maxi has manual transmission. 1969 Austin Maxi will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | Maxi | S40 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 60 L |