1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | Maxi | CTS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 400 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.9 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 64 L |