1969 Austin Maxi vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Austin Maxi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Austin Maxi would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG TF weights approximately 183 kg more than 1969 Austin Maxi.
Because 2006 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Austin Maxi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Austin Maxi | 2006 MG TF | |
Make | Austin | MG |
Model | Maxi | TF |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 987 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 50 L |